17/07/2020

Los invitamos a leer este artículo titulado "Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in adult patients undergoing neurosurgical interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism" que cuenta con la participación del profesor Juan José Yepes Nuñez de la facultad de medicina de la Universidad de los Andes junto a un gran grupo de profesionales a nivel internacional.

The impact of pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing neurosurgical intervention remains uncertain. We reviewed the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic compared with nonpharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in neurosurgical patients. Three databases were searched through April 2018, including those for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and for nonrandomized controlled studies (NRSs). Independent reviewers assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Seven RCTs and 3 NRSs proved eligible. No studies reported on symptomatic proximal and distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Two RCTs reported on screening-detected proximal and distal DVTs. We used the findings of these 2 RCTs as the closest surrogate outcomes to inform the proximal and distal DVT outcomes. These 2 RCTs suggest that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis may decrease the risk of developing asymptomatic proximal DVT (relative risk [RR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.84; low certainty). Findings were uncertain for mortality (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.57-2.86; low certainty), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.03-27.42; very low certainty), asymptomatic distal DVT (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27-1.08; very low certainty), and reoperation (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.06-2.84; very low certainty) outcomes. NRSs also reported uncertain findings for whether pharmacologic prophylaxis affects mortality (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-1.13; low certainty) and PE (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.01-3.76). For risk of bleeding, findings were uncertain in both RCTs (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.70-3.50; low certainty) and NRSs (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.30-7.12; very low certainty). In patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures, low certainty of evidence suggests that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis confers benefit for preventing asymptomatic (screening-detected) proximal DVT with very low certainty regarding its impact on patient-important outcomes.

Consulta el artículo completo aquí

Noticias Recientes

  • Admitidos Maestría en Bioética y Ética de la Investigación 2025-

    Encuentra aquí el número de documento de los admitidos a nuestro programa de Maestría...

  • Semilleros de Investigación 2024-2

    En nuestra más...

  • Admitidos Posgrados Médico-quirúrgicos 2025-1

    Encuentra aquí el número de documento de los admitidos a nuestros programas de...

  • Curso de Actualización Profesional para Médicos Generales Versió

    Gracias a la alianza...

  • EpiAndes en la COP-16

    El pasado 23 de...

  • Nuestra Facultad destaca en el Congreso Nacional de Psiquiatría

    El LXII Congreso...

  • Uniandes y ASPEN Lideran el Futuro de la Cardiología en Heart Ex

    El Curso Heart...

  • Apuestas de Paz desde el Pacífico diverso
    ...
  • Uniandes y la Industria Farmacéutica: Un Encuentro para Potencia

    El pasado 25 de...

  • Semana TEC: Uniendo Ciencia y Cultura en Uniandes

    En la semana del 21...

  • Dra. Sandra Jaramillo impulsa estándares en simulación clínica d

    Es un honor para...

  • Diálogos SALURBAL-CLIMA

    Revive nuestro evento...